Supreme Court meets today to decide 6 remaining cases, including birthright citizenship

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

WASHINGTON -- The Supreme Court is meeting Friday to decide the final six cases of its term, including President Donald Trump's bid to enforce his executive order denying birthright citizenship to U.S.-born children of parents who are in the country illegally.

The justices take the bench at 10 a.m. for their last public session until the start of their new term on Oct. 6.

The birthright citizenship order has been blocked nationwide by three lower courts. The Trump administration made an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to narrow the court orders that have prevented the citizenship changes from taking effect anywhere in the U.S.

The issue before the justices is whether to limit the authority of judges to issue nationwide injunctions, which have plagued both Republican and Democratic administrations in the past 10 years.

People are also reading... Virginia High community still mourning after tragic death of popular athlete Chelsey King Abingdon couple embraces sweet smell of success with farm, sanctuary Alabama man faces additional charges in Bristol cold case murder Former NASCAR team owner McClure dies Crews battle blaze at Bristol Tennessee tire recycling facility BRIEFS: Nick Hood steps down as softball coach at Rye Cove; E&H, Ferrum to renew football rivalry HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL: Abingdon tight end Aidan Woods (North Carolina), Ridgeview punter Connor Smith (Arkansas) commit to Power 5 programs Crowd lines Abingdon sidewalks for "No Kings" rally HIGH SCHOOL FOOTBALL: Last week's tire flipping competition on State Street between Virginia High, Tennessee High builds excitement for V-T Game HIGH SCHOOL GIRLS HOOPS: New state, new team for Scottie Whaley as ex-Science Hill boss now guiding John Battle Trojans HIGH SCHOOL BASEBALL: Christian Taylor's coaching path leads him back home to Sullivan East Local Chick-fil-A restaurants offering Dollywood discount coupons BRIEFS: Eastside takes top honors on all-state softball team New Blountville roundabout opens ahead of July 4th parade Ten Washington County students treated following incident on VT campus

These nationwide court orders have emerged as an important check on Trump's efforts and a source of mounting frustration to the Republican president and his allies.

Decisions also are expected in several other important cases.

The court seemed likely during arguments in April to side with Maryland parents in a religious rights case over LGBTQ storybooks in public schools.

Parents in the Montgomery County school system, in suburban Washington, want to be able to pull their children out of lessons that use the storybooks, which the county added to the curriculum to better reflect the district's diversity.

The school system at one point allowed parents to remove their children from those lessons, but then reversed course because it found the opt-out policy to be disruptive. Sex education is the only area of instruction with an opt-out provision in the county's schools.

The justices also are weighing a three-year battle over congressional districts in Louisiana that is making its second trip to the Supreme Court.

Before the court now is a map that created a second Black majority congressional district among Louisiana's six seats in the House of Representatives. The district elected a Black Democrat in 2024.

Lower courts have struck down two Louisiana congressional maps since 2022 and the justices are considering whether to send state lawmakers back to the map-drawing board for a third time.

The case involves the interplay between race and politics in drawing political boundaries in front of a conservative-led court that has been skeptical of considerations of race in public life.

At arguments in March, several of the court's conservative justices suggested they could vote to throw out the map and make it harder, if not impossible, to bring redistricting lawsuits under the Voting Rights Act.

Free speech rights are at the center of a case over a Texas law aimed at blocking kids from seeing online pornography.

Texas is among more than a dozen states with age verification laws. The states argue the laws are necessary as smartphones have made access to online porn, including hardcore obscene material, almost instantaneous.

The question for the court is whether the measure infringes on the constitutional rights of adults as well. The Free Speech Coalition, an adult-entertainment industry trade group, agrees that children shouldn't be seeing pornography. But it says the Texas law is written too broadly and wrongly affects adults by requiring them to submit personal identifying information online that is vulnerable to hacking or tracking.

Sign up for our Crime & Courts newsletter

Get the latest in local public safety news with this weekly email.

Sign up! * I understand and agree that registration on or use of this site constitutes agreement to its user agreement and privacy policy.